The variety of Bitcoin (BTC) nodes signaling help for Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal 110 (BIP-110), a brief mushy fork limiting the quantity of knowledge included in every transaction on the consensus stage, rose to 2.38%.
583 out of 24,481 nodes are operating BIP-110, and the first node software program implementation for operating the mushy fork proposal is Bitcoin Knots, in response to The Bitcoin Portal.
BIP-110 limits the dimensions of transaction outputs to 34 bytes and caps the OP_RETURN knowledge restrict to 83 bytes. The non permanent mushy fork shall be deployed for 1 yr, with potential extension or alteration after the 1-year time period, in response to the proposal’s GitHub web page.
OP_RETURN is a script code that permits customers to embed arbitrary knowledge and has been the topic of intense debate throughout the Bitcoin neighborhood following the discharge of Bitcoin Core model 30, the most recent improve of probably the most extensively used Bitcoin node software program.
The OP_RETURN restrict was capped at 83 bytes, which Bitcoin Core builders unilaterally eliminated in Bitcoin Core model 30, following a controversial pull request, first proposed in April 2025. The proposal was usually opposed by the Bitcoin neighborhood.
Associated: Bitcoiners reject quantum computing fears as reason for value stoop
The arbitrary knowledge difficulty creates a divide throughout the Bitcoin neighborhood
The Bitcoin Core replace that eliminated the info restrict went reside in October 2025, sparking a torrent of destructive suggestions from critics, who say that eradicating the arbitrary knowledge restrict incentivizes spam on the Bitcoin ledger.
Arbitrary knowledge will increase the storage prices of operating a Bitcoin node, and the prohibitive value results in elevated centralization of the Bitcoin community.
Bitcoin nodes will be run on consumer-grade computer systems, in contrast to high-throughput blockchains that generate massive portions of knowledge and require specialised {hardware}.
Growing node {hardware} necessities undermines the Bitcoin protocol’s worth proposition of being a decentralized financial community, in response to critics. Bitcoin advocate and educator Matthew Kratter stated:
“It is like a type of parasitical vegetation, like ivy, utterly protecting a tree, consuming up the tree, after which the inside scaffolding collapses, and the ivy collapses as a result of it is mainly destroyed the construction. That is what spam has the potential to do to Bitcoin.”
Others like Jameson Lopp, a Bitcoin Core contributor, help the uncapped OP_Return Restrict, arguing that filters do little to cease spam on the community.
Journal: Huge questions: Would Bitcoin survive a 10-year energy outage?